From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. ManTech International Corp.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 6, 2015
EDCV 14-02301-VAP (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2015)

Opinion

          For James F. Parker, Jr., Plaintiff: Colin R Hagan, LEAD ATTORNEY, Travis M Tatko, Shlansky Law Group LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Marc E Berkemeier, Richard J Decker, LEAD ATTORNEYS, Raines Feldman LLP, Beverly Hills, CA; James P McEvilly, III, PRO HAC VICE, Shlansky Law Group LLP, Wilmington, DE.

          For ManTech International Corporation, a Virginia corporation, Defendant: Michael Alexander Gregg, Tracy R Williams, LEAD ATTORNEYS, Littler Mendelson PC, Irvine, CA.


          Present: HON. KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

          DOCKET ENTRY PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

          HON. KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

         The parties' proposed Stipulation and Protective Order has been referred by the District Judge to the Magistrate Judge for consideration. The parties are advised the Court declines to issue the proposed protective order to which they have stipulated for the following reasons:

1. While the Court is willing to enter a protective order in accordance with the parties' stipulation in order to facilitate the conduct of discovery, the Court is unwilling to include in the protective order any provisions relating to evidence presented at trial or other court hearings or proceedings. That is a matter the parties will need to take up with the judicial officer conducting the proceeding at the appropriate time. The stipulation should, thus, include language to make this explicit.

2. The protective order needs to be revised to make clear that the terms of the Protective Order do not apply to the Court and court personnel, who are subject only to the Court's internal procedures regarding the handling of material filed or lodged, including material filed or lodged under seal.

3. Proposed ¶ ¶ 6 and 12 need to be revised to make clear that any motion challenging a designation of material as Confidential or requesting a modification of the Protective Order will need to be made in strict compliance with Local Rules 37-1 and 37-2 (including the Joint Stipulation requirement).

         The parties are further directed to the Court's sample stipulated protective order located on the Court's website for a sample of the format of an approved stipulated protective order.


Summaries of

Parker v. ManTech International Corp.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 6, 2015
EDCV 14-02301-VAP (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Parker v. ManTech International Corp.

Case Details

Full title:James F. Parker v. Mantech International Corp

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jul 6, 2015

Citations

EDCV 14-02301-VAP (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2015)