From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Haaland

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 15, 2022
22-CV-8107 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-8107 (LTS)

12-15-2022

JAMAL PARKER, Plaintiff, v. DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

By order dated September 23, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. On September 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a “Master Bill of Lading” stating his “objection” to the Court's order directing him to file an IFP application or pay the filing fees. Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Parker v. Haaland

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 15, 2022
22-CV-8107 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Parker v. Haaland

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL PARKER, Plaintiff, v. DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 15, 2022

Citations

22-CV-8107 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2022)