Parker v. Fedex National, Inc.

1 Citing case

  1. Romo v. McKesson Corp.

    Case No. ED 12-2036 PSG (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2015)   Cited 3 times

    Defendant points out, a fact that Plaintiff does not challenge, that judges in the Central District of California have more than twice weighted filings than judges in the Eastern District of Kentucky. See id. ("According to statistics compiled by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the Federal Judiciary, there were 663 weighted filings per judge in the Central District of California in 2014, compared with 299 weighted filings per judge in the Eastern District of Kentucky."); see also Parker v. FedEx Nat'l, Inc., 2010 WL 5113809, at *4 (E.D. Cal. 2010) ("[B]oth the Central and Eastern District [of California] are over-burdened with significant caseloads."). Lastly, a consideration of the "relevant public policy of the forum state," in this case California, also supports transfer of the actions.