Opinion
No. 2:16-cv-02140 TLN AC (PS)
08-31-2017
AKIKA PARKER, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF SACRAMENTO, CA, Defendant.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. ("Local Rule") 302(c)(21). On November 1, 2016, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint because it named only defendants who are immune from suit. ECF No. 7. The court granted plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. Id. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. On June 7, 2017, this court issued an order to show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff filed no response.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. See Olivares v. Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th Cir. 1995) (affirming dismissal for failure to pay partial filing fee under IFP statute); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (lack of prosecution); Local Rule 110 (failure to comply with court orders).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: August 31, 2017
/s/_________
ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE