Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-5569
08-10-2011
RICHARD PARKER, Petitioner v. WARDEN MICHAEL CURLEY, et al., Respondents
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10 day of August, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1) filed October 19,2010, Petitioner's Application for Relief (Docket No. 3) filed November 1, 2010, the Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 12) filed February 17, 2011, the Response to Petitioner's November 1,2010 Application for Relief (Docket No. 14) filed March 15, 2011, Petitioner's Traverse and Response to the Commonwealth's Answer to His Habeas Corpus Petition/Application for Relief (Docket No. 21) filed May 26, 2011, and after review of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated July 19,2011, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
This document was attached as Appendix (A) to Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. On November I, 2010, this Court filed this document, which is entitled "Application for Relief Seeking Stay and Abeyance Nunc Pro Tunc Due to Extraordinary Circumstances of Government Interference/Attorney Malfeasance and/or Sufficiently Egregious Behavior."
1. the R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing;
3. Petitioner's Application for Relief is DENIED; and
4. there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, J.