From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2019
No. 19-6298 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-6298

04-30-2019

ANTONIO DEMETRIUS PARKER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE; COMMONWEALTH OF VA, Respondents - Appellees.

Antonio Demetrius Parker, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00145-AJT-MSN) Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Demetrius Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Antonio Demetrius Parker seeks to appeal the district court's orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Parker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Parker v. Clarke

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 30, 2019
No. 19-6298 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Parker v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO DEMETRIUS PARKER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 30, 2019

Citations

No. 19-6298 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2019)