From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Carey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-4267 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-4267

12-13-2012

Ruth Parker, Plaintiff, Pro se v. Dennis L. and Diane Carey, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


IN PART

AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 5), Plaintiff's Motion for Change of Venue and Dismissal of Summary Judgment (ECF 10), and Defendants' Reply (ECF 11), and the arguments put forth at the oral argument on December 11, 2012, and for the reasons stated in the Memorandum of Law issued on this day, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 5) is GRANTED in part, as to Plaintiff's federal claims under the Clean Water Act and National Historic Preservation Act.

2. Plaintiff's cause of action for trespass is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. Plaintiff's Motion for Change of Venue and Dismissal of Summary Judgment (ECF 10) is DENIED.

4. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff as to Plaintiff's claims under the Clean Water Act and National Historic Preservation Act.

5. The Clerk shall close this case.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON , U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Parker v. Carey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-4267 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Parker v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:Ruth Parker, Plaintiff, Pro se v. Dennis L. and Diane Carey, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-4267 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2012)