From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Apr 13, 2010
Case No. CIV-09-424-F (W.D. Okla. Apr. 13, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-09-424-F.

April 13, 2010


ORDER


On March 22, 2010, United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts issued a Report and Recommendation, wherein she recommended that defendant's final decision denying plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income payments be reversed and that the matter be remanded for further administrative proceedings. Magistrate Judge Roberts advised the parties of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by April 12, 2010, and further advised the parties that failure to file a timely objection waives their right to appellate review of both factual and legal issues therein contained.

To date, no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed, and no request for an extension of time to object has been filed. With no objection being filed by either party within the time prescribed, the court accepts, adopts, and affirms the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts on March 22, 2010 (doc. no. 24) is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED, and AFFIRMED. The decision of defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED to the defendant for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Judgment shall issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Parker v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Apr 13, 2010
Case No. CIV-09-424-F (W.D. Okla. Apr. 13, 2010)
Case details for

Parker v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DARREN PARKER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Apr 13, 2010

Citations

Case No. CIV-09-424-F (W.D. Okla. Apr. 13, 2010)

Citing Cases

Hooper v. Colvin

Id. Based on Carpenter, some courts have required the ALJ and VE utilize specific DOT job positions rather…