From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
May 17, 2006
No. CV05-3299-PHX-SRB (D. Ariz. May. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV05-3299-PHX-SRB.

May 17, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, Michael Parker, filed his Civil Rights Complaint on October 19, 2005. On March 22, 2006, the Court issued a screen order advising Plaintiff that "at all times during the pendency of this action, Plaintiff shall immediately advise the Court and the United States Marshal of any change of address and its effective date. On March 27, 2006 Plaintiff's copy of the March 22, 2006 order was returned by the post-office with the notation "Inmate Is No Longer In Custody."

The Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation on April 11, 2006 recommending that Plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 3.4, Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona and Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. The Court notes that the Plaintiff's copy of the Report and Recommendation has been returned by the post-office with the notation "Inmate Is No Longer In Custody." The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case for Plaintiff's failure to comply with Rule 3.4, Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona and Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.


Summaries of

Parker v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
May 17, 2006
No. CV05-3299-PHX-SRB (D. Ariz. May. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Parker v. Arpaio

Case Details

Full title:Michael Parker, Plaintiff, v. Joseph Arpaio, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: May 17, 2006

Citations

No. CV05-3299-PHX-SRB (D. Ariz. May. 17, 2006)