From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Park v. Tipton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Apr 14, 2014
CASE NO. C13-5921BHS (W.D. Wash. Apr. 14, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. C13-5921BHS

04-14-2014

ALLIXZANDER D. PARK, Plaintiff, v. MARK T. TIPTON, JOSEPH NORTON, BRIAN YANKEY, ROXANE PAYNE, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 48. The Court having considered the R&R and the remaining record, and no objections having been filed, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED.

(2) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. 33) is GRANTED. All claims against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's motion to amend (Dkt. 41) is DENIED.

__________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Park v. Tipton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Apr 14, 2014
CASE NO. C13-5921BHS (W.D. Wash. Apr. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Park v. Tipton

Case Details

Full title:ALLIXZANDER D. PARK, Plaintiff, v. MARK T. TIPTON, JOSEPH NORTON, BRIAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Apr 14, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. C13-5921BHS (W.D. Wash. Apr. 14, 2014)