Park v. Park

Full title: Walter E. Park, Respondent, v. Edith Park. Appellant

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1905

110 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1905)

Opinion

December, 1905.

Present — O'Brien, P.J., Patterson (dissenting), Ingraham, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Considering the nature of the action, we think that the defendant should be allowed to serve a supplemental answer. The fact that she did not make the affidavit is explained by her absence in Europe, sick. The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion granted.

PER CURIAM:

Order reversed and motion granted.