From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Park Regency, LLC v. Pitts

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 10, 2023
23-cv-01144-JD (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-01144-JD

05-10-2023

PARK REGENCY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LEANDER PITTS, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION, AND

REMANDING CASE

JAMES DONATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is an unlawful detainer action that was removed to this court by pro se defendant LeAnn Pitts. Dkt. No. 1. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore has filed a report recommending remand because there is no basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction over this state law unlawful detainer action. Dkt. No. 8. Judge Westmore's report explains why there is no basis for federal question jurisdiction, diversity jurisdiction, or admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. Id.

Defendant Pitts has not filed any response to the report and recommendation, and the time for responding has passed. Dkt. No. 8 at 4; Fed.R.Civ.P. 72.

The Court adopts the well-reasoned report and recommendation in full, and orders the case remanded to the Superior Court of California for the County of Contra Costa.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Park Regency, LLC v. Pitts

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 10, 2023
23-cv-01144-JD (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Park Regency, LLC v. Pitts

Case Details

Full title:PARK REGENCY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LEANDER PITTS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 10, 2023

Citations

23-cv-01144-JD (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2023)

Citing Cases

Tenderloin Neighborhood Dev. Corp. v. Jones

Unlawful detainer claims do not arise under federal law. See, e.g., Barrie, 2020 WL 8513084, at *2-3…