Opinion
Nos. 05-09-00345-CR, 05-09-00346-CR, 05-09-00347-CR
Opinion issued June 24, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F08-53474-LN, F08-71655-MN F09-32911-SN.
Before Justices O'NEILL, FRANCIS, and MURPHY.
OPINION
Kayla Danielle Parish appeals her convictions for robbery and theft. In the fall of 2008, appellant entered open guilty pleas to the two charged robbery offenses and was placed on deferred adjudication for eight years. In January 2009, appellant was charged with theft. Thereafter, the State filed motions to proceed with an adjudication of guilt in each robbery case. Appellant entered an open guilty plea to the theft charge and pleas of true to the State's allegations in each robbery case. The trial court adjudicated appellant's guilt in the robbery cases and sentenced her to two years in prison for each robbery offense. The trial court found appellant guilty in the theft case and sentenced her to one year in state jail. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the records showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant she has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the records and counsel's brief. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgment.