From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parise v. Pepe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1946
270 App. Div. 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

January 21, 1946.

Present — Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Nolan, JJ.


In an action for a partnership accounting, the complaint alleged that plaintiffs and respondent were partners in the conduct of a package liquor store business, and that the license therefor was issued in the name of respondent. The complaint was dismissed on respondent's motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and plaintiffs appeal from the order dismissing the complaint and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. ( Carmine v. Murphy, 285 N.Y. 413; O'Connor v. O'Connor, 263 App. Div. 820, affd. 288 N.Y. 579.)


Summaries of

Parise v. Pepe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1946
270 App. Div. 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Parise v. Pepe

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD PARISE et al., Appellants, v. JOHN PEPE, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
59 N.Y.S.2d 497

Citing Cases

Sponholz v. Meyer

" See Smith v. Smith (1949), 255 Wis. 96, 38 N.W.2d 12. Similar contracts, all dealing with partnerships…

Griffin v. Cafarelli

In our opinion the general rule applicable to the instant case is that one partner cannot compel his…