Opinion
233-22
03-11-2022
Orlando Monte Parham Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent
ORDER
Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge.
On March 10, 2022, respondent filed electronically in the above-docketed matter duplicative copies of an Answer to Amended Petition. The first, however, was improperly designated for electronic filing purposes as an "Answer to Amendment to Petition". The second was correctly titled.
Accordingly, the premises considered, it is
ORDERED that the purported Answer to Amendment to Petition filed March 10, 2022, is hereby deemed stricken from the Court's record in this case.