From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parents for Quality Educ. v. State of Indiana

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Feb 18, 1993
986 F.2d 206 (7th Cir. 1993)

Opinion

No. 91-3437.

February 18, 1993.

Before CUMMINGS and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges, and DILLIN, District Judge.

Hon. S. Hugh Dillin, of the Southern District of Indiana, is sitting by designation.


ORDER ON REHEARING

The State of Indiana is not, under the Eleventh Amendment, a proper defendant and is hereby dismissed.

The opinion of the court issued October 23, 1992, 977 F.2d 1207, is hereby modified as provided in this order.

On page 3 of the opinion, 14 lines from the top, delete the parenthetical reading:

(the State of Indiana and state officials)

On further consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, no judge in active service has requested a vote thereon and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing be, and the same is hereby, DENIED.


Summaries of

Parents for Quality Educ. v. State of Indiana

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Feb 18, 1993
986 F.2d 206 (7th Cir. 1993)
Case details for

Parents for Quality Educ. v. State of Indiana

Case Details

Full title:PARENTS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION WITH INTEGRATION, INC., SCEPTER BROWNLEE, BY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Feb 18, 1993

Citations

986 F.2d 206 (7th Cir. 1993)

Citing Cases

Veterans Legal Defense Fund v. Schwartz

However, the Young exception "permits relief against state officials only when there is an ongoing or…

Thorpe v. Virginia State University

ion with respect to claims initiated under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Section 504 of the…