From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parelman v. Parelman

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 4, 1954
210 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 11732.

Argued November 18, 1953.

Decided February 4, 1954.

Mr. J.E. Bindeman, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Mr. Theodore Kligman, Washington, D.C., entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. Albert E. Brault, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Denver H. Graham, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.


In this suit a mother charged her son with negligence which she alleged was the proximate cause of personal injuries sustained by her, for which she sought damages in the sum of $25,000. The mother complains on appeal that the trial judge erred in directing a verdict for the defendant at the close of her counsel's opening statement to the jury.

We think the judge correctly concluded, from what the plaintiff's counsel said he expected to prove, that a cause of action had not been stated.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Parelman v. Parelman

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 4, 1954
210 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Parelman v. Parelman

Case Details

Full title:PARELMAN v. PARELMAN

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 4, 1954

Citations

210 F.2d 29 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Citing Cases

Alexander, et al. v. Jennings, et al

" See also Oscanyan v. Arms Company, 103 U.S. 261, 26 L.Ed. 539; Halin v. United Mine Workers of America, 97…