From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parejo v. Frakes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
May 31, 2013
No. C10-5764 RBL/JRC (W.D. Wash. May. 31, 2013)

Opinion

No. C10-5764 RBL/JRC

05-31-2013

MANUEL PAREJO, Petitioner, v. SCOTT FRAKES, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Petitioner's Second Motion to Amend (ECF No. 52) is DENIED.

(3) This action is referred to Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura for further proceedings.

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for any Defendants who have appeared, and to the Hon. J. Richard Creatura.

__________________________

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Parejo v. Frakes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
May 31, 2013
No. C10-5764 RBL/JRC (W.D. Wash. May. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Parejo v. Frakes

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL PAREJO, Petitioner, v. SCOTT FRAKES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: May 31, 2013

Citations

No. C10-5764 RBL/JRC (W.D. Wash. May. 31, 2013)

Citing Cases

Craner v. Marshall

Nor is there any substantive due process right, under Supreme Court precedent, created by California's parole…