From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paredes v. Otiz

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 17, 2021
20 Civ. 9828 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 9828 (PGG)

11-17-2021

NICHOLAS PAREDES, Plaintiff, v. FELICITA OTIZ and FRITO LAY ROLLING, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.:

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that if the settlement is not consummated within thirty days of this order, any party may apply by letter within the thirty-day period for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Any pending dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die, and any pending motions are moot.

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Paredes v. Otiz

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 17, 2021
20 Civ. 9828 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Paredes v. Otiz

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS PAREDES, Plaintiff, v. FELICITA OTIZ and FRITO LAY ROLLING…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 9828 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2021)