Paradise v. State

16 Citing cases

  1. Wilson v. IVY Mill Plantation Homeowners Ass'n

    No. A24A1514 (Ga. Ct. App. Feb. 3, 2025)

    (Citation omitted.) Paradise v. State, 321 Ga.App. 371, 373 (740 S.E.2d 238) (2013); see also Gilchrist v. Gilchrist, 323 Ga.App. 555, 557 (2) (747 S.E.2d 75) (2013) (noting the "fundamental principle that a litigant does not get a second . . . chance to appeal the same order") (punctuation omitted)

  2. State v. Peppers

    No. A24A0945 (Ga. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2024)

    litigated. Paradise v. State, 321 Ga.App. 371, 373 (740 S.E.2d 238) (2013); Bryson v. State, 369 Ga.App. 560, 567 (5) (894 S.E.2d 120) (2023).

  3. Daniels v. State

    No. A25A0621 (Ga. Ct. App. Nov. 14, 2024)

    " Howard v. State, 289 Ga. 207, 207 (1) (710 S.E.2d 761) (2011); see also Paradise v. State, 321 Ga.App. 371, 373 (740 S.E.2d 238) (2013) (although a void sentence may be challenged at any time, this principle is nevertheless subject to the equally well-established principles of res judicata and the law-of-the-case rule); Ross v. State, 310 Ga.App. 326, 328 (713 S.E.2d 438) (2011) (a void sentence is subject to res judicata and the law-of-the-case rule, and a defendant is "not entitled to multiple bites at the apple").

  4. Sims v. State

    No. A24A1614 (Ga. Ct. App. Jun. 28, 2024)

    " Howard v. State, 289 Ga. 207, 207 (1) (710 S.E.2d 761) (2011); see also Paradise v. State, 321 Ga.App. 371, 373 (740 S.E.2d 238) (2013) (although a void sentence may be challenged at any time, this principle is nevertheless subject to the equally well-established principles of res judicata and the law-of-the-case rule); Ross v. State, 310 Ga.App. 326, 328 (713 S.E.2d 438) (2011) (a void sentence is subject to res judicata and law-of-the-case rule, and a defendant is "not entitled to multiple bites at the apple").

  5. Holton v. State

    No. A24A0646 (Ga. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 2024)

    Id. at 328; see also Paradise v. State, 321 Ga.App. 371, 373 (740 S.E.2d 238) (2013) ("Although a void sentence may be challenged at any time, this important legal principle is, nevertheless, subject to the equally well established principles of res judicata and the law-of-the-case rule once the issue has been raised and ruled upon.")

  6. Bryson v. State

    No. A23A1157 (Ga. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2023)

    (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Paradise v. State, 321 Ga.App. 371, 373 (740 S.E.2d 238) (2013); OCGA § 9-11-60 (h).

  7. Johnson v. State

    No. A23A1729 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 23, 2023)

    Given that Johnson previously appealed the same sentences and convictions, this current appeal is barred. See Norris v. Norris, 281 Ga. 566, 567-568 (2) (642 S.E.2d 34) (2007) (res judicata barred claim that had been raised in a prior appeal which the Court had dismissed); Paradise v. State, 321 Ga.App. 371, 373 (740 S.E.2d 238) (2013) (although a void sentence may be challenged at any time, this principle is nevertheless subject to the equally well-established principles of res judicata and the law-of-the-case rule); Ross v. State, 310 Ga.App. 326, 328 (713 S.E.2d 438) (2011) (a void sentence is subject to res judicata and law-of-the-case rule, and a defendant is "not entitled to multiple bites at the apple").

  8. Rooney v. State

    No. A23A1483 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 9, 2023)

    In light of Rooney's previous appeals, we are precluded from revisiting the issue. See Paradise v. State, 321 Ga.App. 371, 373 (740 S.E.2d 238) (2013) (“Although a void sentence may be challenged at any time, ‘this important legal principle is, nevertheless, subject to the equally well established principles of res judicata and the law-of-the-case rule once the issue has been raised and ruled upon.

  9. Stover v. State

    No. A23A1666 (Ga. Ct. App. Jul. 20, 2023)

    Given that Stover previously appealed the same amended sentence, this current appeal is barred. See Norris v. Norris, 281 Ga. 566, 567-568 (2) (642 S.E.2d 34) (2007) (res judicata barred claim that had been raised in a prior appeal which the Court had dismissed as untimely); Paradise v. State, 321 Ga.App. 371, 373 (740 S.E.2d 238) (2013) (although a void sentence may be challenged at any time, this principle is nevertheless subject to the equally well-established principles of res judicata and the law-of-the-case rule); Ross v. State, 310 Ga.App. 326, 328 (713 S.E.2d 438) (2011) (while a void sentence is a nullity and may be vacated at any time, it is still subject to res judicata and law-of-the-case rule; a defendant is "not entitled to multiple bites at the apple").

  10. Westbrook v. State

    No. A23D0318 (Ga. Ct. App. May. 24, 2023)

    Jackson v. State, 273 Ga. 320, 320 (540 S.E.2d 612) (2001). See also Paradise v. State, 321 Ga.App. 371, 373 (740 S.E.2d 238) (2013) ("Although a void sentence may be challenged at any time, this important legal principle is, nevertheless, subject to the equally well established principles of res judicata and the law-of-the-case rule once the issue has been raised and ruled upon.")