From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pappas v. Zimet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 29, 2001
287 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued September 21, 2001.

October 29, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered June 23, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict finding that the defendant was not at fault in the happening of the accident, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

Silbowitz, Garafola, Silbowitz Schatz (Irwin M. Silbowitz and Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for appellants.

John P. Healy (Barry, McTiernan Moore, New York, N.Y. [Laurel A. Wedinger and Anthony J. McNulty] of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants' contentions, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury's finding that the defendant was not at fault in the happening of the accident was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence, and should not be disturbed (see, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129; cf., McCusker v. Huben, 253 A.D.2d 542).

KRAUSMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, SCHMIDT and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pappas v. Zimet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 29, 2001
287 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Pappas v. Zimet

Case Details

Full title:ANDREA PAPPAS, ET AL., appellants, v. LILLI ZIMET, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 29, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 174