From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pappas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 12, 1990
567 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-02115.

October 12, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; James S. Parker, Judge.

Toby Isaacson, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Anthony Pappas appeals his convictions for bringing a controlled substance into the state of Florida, a violation of section 893.13(1)(d), Florida Statutes (1985), and conspiring to bring a controlled substance into the state. The sole issue on appeal concerns the denial of Pappas's motion to suppress wiretap evidence. As conceded by the state, the wiretap application and order in this case are the same as in our recent decision Sutton v. State, 556 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). In Sutton we reversed the appellants' convictions after concluding that the facts supporting the wiretap application were too stale to have justified the wiretap order. Consistent with that holding we reverse the order denying Pappas's motion to suppress wiretap evidence, set aside the convictions, and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pappas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 12, 1990
567 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Pappas v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY G. PAPPAS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 12, 1990

Citations

567 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)