Opinion
2013-07013 Index No. 203531/04.
12-23-2015
Maria PAPPAS, respondent, v. Anthony PAPPAS, appellant.
Langione, Catterson & LoFrumento, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Jeffrey L. Catterson of counsel), for appellant. Kruman & Kruman, P.C., Malverne, N.Y. (Henry E. Kruman of counsel), for respondent.
Langione, Catterson & LoFrumento, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Jeffrey L. Catterson of counsel), for appellant.
Kruman & Kruman, P.C., Malverne, N.Y. (Henry E. Kruman of counsel), for respondent.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Hope Schwartz Zimmerman, J.), dated May 13, 2013. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the defendant's motion to refer the plaintiff to the District Attorney on the basis of her alleged perjurious sworn testimony.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his motion to refer the plaintiff to the District Attorney based on her allegedly perjurious sworn testimony (see Stow v. Stow, 262 A.D.2d 550, 551, 694 N.Y.S.2d 68; Matter of Carroll v. Gammerman, 193 A.D.2d 202, 206, 602 N.Y.S.2d 841).
RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, CHAMBERS and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.