From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pappas v. Hooda Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 2000
277 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued November 3, 2000.

November 28, 2000.

In an action for specific performance of a real estate contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated June 30, 1999, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs' motion to compel specific performance of the terms of a stipulation of settlement.

Mischel, Neuman Horn, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Scott T. Horn of counsel), for appellant.

Brook Boyd, P.C., New York, N.Y., for respondents.

Before: WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court did not err in granting the motion of the plaintiffs to compel specific performance of the terms of a stipulation of settlement.

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Pappas v. Hooda Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 2000
277 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Pappas v. Hooda Realty

Case Details

Full title:STEVE PAPPAS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. HOODA REALTY, INC., APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 906