Opinion
2003-407 K C.
Decided April 9, 2004.
Appeal by plaintiff from a small claims judgment of the Civil Court, Kings County (M. Solomon, J.), entered on December 27, 2001, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
PRESENT: PESCE, P.J., PATTERSON and GOLIA, JJ.
Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover monies allegedly due as a result of defendant's breach of a rental agreement. Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the evidence adduced at trial, including plaintiff's own admission, established that the action accrued in September 1991 when payment for rent became due. Since, more than 6 years elapsed before the action was commenced, the action is time-barred (CPLR 213). Furthermore, there was no evidence presented at trial demonstrating that defendant fraudulently induced plaintiff or that he concealed any facts regarding payment of rent from plaintiff.
Thus, substantial justice was done between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (CCA 1807). Further, we find that the court maintained a balanced and impartial demeanor during the trial and considered relevant and competent evidence before rendering a verdict.