From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pappan v. Kan. Dep't of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Apr 15, 2016
369 P.3d 341 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Summary

holding officer substantially complied with notice provision

Summary of this case from State v. Stoll

Opinion

No. 112,677.

04-15-2016

James Earl PAPPAN, Appellant/Cross–Appellee, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Cross–Appellant.

James Earl Pappan, appellant/cross-appellee pro se. J. Brian Cox, deputy general counsel, of Legal Services Bureau, Kansas Department of Revenue, for appellee/cross-appellant.


Decision Without Published Opinion

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Pappan v. Kan. Dep't of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Apr 15, 2016
369 P.3d 341 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

holding officer substantially complied with notice provision

Summary of this case from State v. Stoll
Case details for

Pappan v. Kan. Dep't of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:James Earl PAPPAN, Appellant/Cross–Appellee, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Apr 15, 2016

Citations

369 P.3d 341 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

Gomez v. Kan. Dep't of Revenue

"In Kugler v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 2012 WL 2045379, *4 (Kan. App. 2012) (unpublished) with similar facts,…

State v. Stoll

2010 WL 5490738, at *5. See also Pappan v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue , No. 112,677, 2016 WL 1545650, at *7…