From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Papia v. General Motors Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 3, 2005
Case No. C 05-00043 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. C 05-00043 CRB.

October 3, 2005

WILSON PETTY KOSMO TURNER LLP, VICKIE E. TURNER, DENNIS E. RAGLIN, San Diego, CA, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION. Attorneys for Defendant.

MICHAEL TRAIN CALDWELL, LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL TRAIN CALDWELL, Attorneys for Plaintiff, FRANCESA PAPIA.


STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)]


THE PARTIES STIPULATE, THROUGH COUNSEL, AS FOLLOWS:

1. That this action shall be dismissed in its entirety and with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a).

PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action is HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Papia v. General Motors Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California
Oct 3, 2005
Case No. C 05-00043 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2005)
Case details for

Papia v. General Motors Corporation

Case Details

Full title:FRANCESCA PAPIA, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Oct 3, 2005

Citations

Case No. C 05-00043 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2005)