From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Papi, LLC v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 16, 2022
3:21-cv-00405-JR (D. Or. Feb. 16, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00405-JR

02-16-2022

PAPI, LLC, an Oregon limited liability Company, dba Papi Chulo's Restaurant, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Defendant.


ORDER

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on November 10, 2021, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and dismiss this case with prejudice. F&R, ECF 24. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation [24]. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [9] is granted and this case is dismissed with prejudice. Pending motions are denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Papi, LLC v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 16, 2022
3:21-cv-00405-JR (D. Or. Feb. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Papi, LLC v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PAPI, LLC, an Oregon limited liability Company, dba Papi Chulo's…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Feb 16, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00405-JR (D. Or. Feb. 16, 2022)