From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Papenfus v. Jackson Cnty. Cmty. Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 2, 2017
Case No. 1:16 CV 02160-CL (D. Or. May. 2, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16 CV 02160-CL

05-02-2017

TERRY PAPENFUS, Plaintiff, v. JACKSON COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Findings and Recommendation on March 22, 2017. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 2ND day of May, 2017.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Papenfus v. Jackson Cnty. Cmty. Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 2, 2017
Case No. 1:16 CV 02160-CL (D. Or. May. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Papenfus v. Jackson Cnty. Cmty. Justice

Case Details

Full title:TERRY PAPENFUS, Plaintiff, v. JACKSON COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 2, 2017

Citations

Case No. 1:16 CV 02160-CL (D. Or. May. 2, 2017)