Opinion
No. 345 CA 21-00723
07-08-2022
SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (CORY J. SCHOONMAKER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY F. ALLEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (CORY J. SCHOONMAKER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY F. ALLEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
PRESENT: LINDLEY, J.P., NEMOYER, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered March 30, 2021. The order denied plaintiff's motion for leave to reargue its opposition to defendants' motion to partially dismiss plaintiff's complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 A.D.2d 983, 984 [4th Dept 1990]).