From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Papaj v. Shannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1989
155 A.D.2d 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 15, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Although plaintiffs failed to present proof of special circumstances to warrant judicial supervision of disclosure (see, Di Giovanni v Pepsico, Inc., 120 A.D.2d 413, 414), they are entitled to disclosure of the names and addresses of persons injured in similar accidents, and the dates of those accidents (see, e.g., Dattmore v Eagan Real Estate, 112 A.D.2d 800). Supreme Court therefore erred in failing to grant this relief.


Summaries of

Papaj v. Shannon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1989
155 A.D.2d 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Papaj v. Shannon

Case Details

Full title:LAURENCE PAPAJ et al., Appellants, v. RETA SHANNON et al., Doing Business…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)