Opinion
April 13, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.).
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provision imposing a $1,000 sanction upon the plaintiff's attorney; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
While the plaintiff's motion to renew lacked merit because the newly acquired document upon which the plaintiff relied did not alter the employment relationship, the motion was not frivolous. Thus, the imposition of a sanction against the plaintiff's attorney was improper. Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.