From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panzo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 28, 2013
120 So. 3d 565 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2D13–795.

2013-08-28

Andrew PANZO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).


BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

As it appears that the petitioner is represented by counsel in the proceeding in the trial court, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla.2003).

DAVIS, C.J., and MORRIS and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Panzo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 28, 2013
120 So. 3d 565 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Panzo v. State

Case Details

Full title:Andrew PANZO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Aug 28, 2013

Citations

120 So. 3d 565 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)