From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pantronix Corp. v. Dimerco Express Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 16, 2011
CASE NO.: CV 112074 (JW) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: CV 112074 (JW)

11-16-2011

PANTRONIX CORPORATION, a corporation licensed to do business in California, Plaintiff, v. DIMERCO EXPRESS (U.S.A.) CORPORATION, a corporation licensed to do business in California; and ASIANA AIRLINES, INC., a corporation licensed to do business in California, Defendants.

Attorney for Plaintiff PANTRONIX CORPORATION Attorney for Defendant DIMERCO EXPRESS (U.S.A.) CORPORATION Attorney for Defendant ASIANA AIRLINES, INC.


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[×] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
[ ] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) _____________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[×] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[ ] other requested deadline ________________________________

Attorney for Plaintiff

PANTRONIX CORPORATION

Attorney for Defendant

DIMERCO EXPRESS (U.S.A.)

CORPORATION

Attorney for Defendant

ASIANA AIRLINES, INC.

Attorney for Plaintiff

PANTRONIX CORPORATION

Attorney for Defendant

DIMERCO EXPRESS (U.S.A.)

CORPORATION

Attorney for Defendant

ASIANA AIRLINES, INC.

Attorney for Plaintiff

PANTRONIX CORPORATION

Attorney for Defendant

DIMERCO EXPRESS (U.S.A.)

CORPORATION

Attorney for Defendant

ASIANA AIRLINES, INC.

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

[ ] Non-binding Arbitration
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) [×] Mediation
[ ] Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session

[×] 90 days from the date of this order.
[ ] other

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pantronix Corp. v. Dimerco Express Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 16, 2011
CASE NO.: CV 112074 (JW) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Pantronix Corp. v. Dimerco Express Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PANTRONIX CORPORATION, a corporation licensed to do business in…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 16, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: CV 112074 (JW) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2011)