From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panton v. Breckon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-1845 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-1845

08-30-2012

ROBERT PANTON, Plaintiff v. CAPTAIN BRECKON, RONNIE HOLT Defendants


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion requesting default judgment due to defendants' failure to respond to his motion for summary judgment (Doc. 43), and it appearing that defendants were afforded until August 15, 2012 to respond to plaintiff's motion (Doc. 39), and it further appearing that on August 15, 2012, defendants filed a brief in opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 41) and a counterstatement of material facts (Doc. 42), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 43) is DENIED.

________________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Panton v. Breckon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-1845 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Panton v. Breckon

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PANTON, Plaintiff v. CAPTAIN BRECKON, RONNIE HOLT Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 30, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-1845 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 30, 2012)