From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panton v. Breckon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 11, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-1845 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-1845

04-11-2012

ROBERT PANTON, Plaintiff v. CAPTAIN BRECKON, RONNIE HOLT Defendants


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. 17), based on defendants' failure to timely plead or otherwise respond to plaintiff's amended complaint (Doc. 9), and it appearing that, although untimely, defendants filed a motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment (Doc. 18) on April 2, 2012, and it further appearing that entry of judgment by default pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) is within the discretion of the trial court, Hritz v. Woma Corp., 732 F.2d 1178, 1180 (3d Cir.1984), and that because the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has emphasized that such "discretion is not without limits" and has repeatedly stated a preference that "cases be disposed of on the merits whenever practicable," id. at 1180-81 (citations omitted), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. 17) is DENIED.

According to the waiver of the service of summons (Doc. 15), defendants were to serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within sixty days from January 18, 2012.

___________________________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Panton v. Breckon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 11, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-1845 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Panton v. Breckon

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PANTON, Plaintiff v. CAPTAIN BRECKON, RONNIE HOLT Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 11, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-1845 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2012)