From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pantlin, Perinton Associates v. Heicklen Farms, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1980
403 N.E.2d 185 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Submitted January 21, 1980

Decided February 7, 1980


Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the consolidated action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 N.Y.2d 754).


Summaries of

Pantlin, Perinton Associates v. Heicklen Farms, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1980
403 N.E.2d 185 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Pantlin, Perinton Associates v. Heicklen Farms, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PETER F. PANTLIN et al., Plaintiffs, and PERINTON ASSOCIATES, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 7, 1980

Citations

403 N.E.2d 185 (N.Y. 1980)
426 N.Y.S.2d 480
49 N.Y.2d 760

Citing Cases

City of New York v. New York City Department of General Services

Decided September 12, 1985 Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the…