From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pante v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 21, 2006
32 A.D.3d 1084 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

500014.

September 21, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which directed that petitioner be placed in administrative segregation.

Matthew Pante, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Andrea Oser of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination placing him in administrative segregation. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Johnson v Goord, 283 AD2d 707, 708).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Pante v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 21, 2006
32 A.D.3d 1084 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Pante v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MATTHEW PANTE, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 21, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 1084 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6516
820 N.Y.S.2d 819

Citing Cases

Colon v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed and…