Opinion
2:21-cv-1447BJR
12-02-2021
PENNY PANNEK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, and LINCOLN TOWING ENTERPRISES, INC. Defendants.
PETER S. HOLMES SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY CAROLYN U. BOIES, WSBA#40395 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ATTORNEY FOR CITY OF SEATTLE JAMES E. LOBSENZ CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN P.S. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL A. MALLOVE, PLLC DANIEL P. MALLOVE, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT LINCOLN TOWING ENTERPRISES
PETER S. HOLMES SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY
CAROLYN U. BOIES, WSBA#40395 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ATTORNEY FOR CITY OF SEATTLE
JAMES E. LOBSENZ
CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN P.S.
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL A. MALLOVE, PLLC
DANIEL P. MALLOVE, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT LINCOLN TOWING ENTERPRISES
DEFENDANTS' STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER
BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Defendant's City of Seattle (hereinafter “City”) and Lincoln Towing Enterprises, Inc. (“Lincoln”) hereby move for an extension of their deadline to answer Plaintiff's complaint from December 3, 2021, until January 3, 2022. The City and Lincoln would benefit from additional time to research and respond to Plaintiff's allegations. All parties stipulate and consent to this motion.
ORDER
THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the foregoing Stipulation, and the Court having considered the Stipulation, and good cause appearing, now, therefore:
IT IS ORDERED THAT the extension is granted and Defendants City of Seattle and Lincoln Towing's answer to Plaintiff's complaint is due January 3, 2022.