Pannek v. City of Seattle

Full title: PENNY PANNEK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, and LINCOLN TOWING…

Court: United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 2, 2021

2:21-cv-1447BJR (W.D. Wash. Dec. 2, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1447BJR

12-02-2021

PENNY PANNEK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, and LINCOLN TOWING ENTERPRISES, INC. Defendants.

PETER S. HOLMES SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY CAROLYN U. BOIES, WSBA#40395 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ATTORNEY FOR CITY OF SEATTLE JAMES E. LOBSENZ CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN P.S. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL A. MALLOVE, PLLC DANIEL P. MALLOVE, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT LINCOLN TOWING ENTERPRISES

BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

PETER S. HOLMES SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY

CAROLYN U. BOIES, WSBA#40395 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ATTORNEY FOR CITY OF SEATTLE

JAMES E. LOBSENZ

CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN P.S.

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL A. MALLOVE, PLLC

DANIEL P. MALLOVE, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT LINCOLN TOWING ENTERPRISES

DEFENDANTS' STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER

BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Defendant's City of Seattle (hereinafter “City”) and Lincoln Towing Enterprises, Inc. (“Lincoln”) hereby move for an extension of their deadline to answer Plaintiff's complaint from December 3, 2021, until January 3, 2022. The City and Lincoln would benefit from additional time to research and respond to Plaintiff's allegations. All parties stipulate and consent to this motion.

ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the foregoing Stipulation, and the Court having considered the Stipulation, and good cause appearing, now, therefore:

IT IS ORDERED THAT the extension is granted and Defendants City of Seattle and Lincoln Towing's answer to Plaintiff's complaint is due January 3, 2022.