Opinion
Gen. No. 41,188. (Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion filed November 4, 1940
GUARANTY, § 18 — revocation, evidence. In action against corporation for compensation for services rendered it as superintendent of its mine, and against one who had guaranteed plaintiff that his salary would be paid, defendant did not establish that plaintiff had received two letters revoking the continuing guaranty, but subsequent correspondence tended to indicate that the guaranty was never revoked.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; Hon. CHARLES S. DOUGHERTY, presiding.
Affirmed. Heard in first division, first district, this court at April term, 1940.
J. Arthur Kealy, for appellants;
Kennedy, Grider Moberley, for cross-appellee.
"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed November 4, 1940.