From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panken v. Holly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1911
146 App. Div. 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Opinion

November, 1911.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Miller and Dowling, JJ.; McLaughlin, J., dissented.


There is no allegation in the complaint to show that the hallway from which the plaintiff fell was one in which the defendants had invited the public to enter or provided for the use of the plaintiff or which he had the right to use; so that the plaintiff does not show a state of facts which imposed upon the defendants the duty of guarding or protecting the entrance to the elevator. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, and the demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to the plaintiff to amend on payment of said costs.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to plaintiff to amend on payment of costs.


Summaries of

Panken v. Holly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1911
146 App. Div. 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)
Case details for

Panken v. Holly

Case Details

Full title:JACOB PANKEN, Appellant, v . HENRY H. HOLLY and HARRIET W. HOLLY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1911

Citations

146 App. Div. 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1911)

Citing Cases

Van Loon v. Smith, Inc.

This allegation is insufficient to charge the defendant with liability under the other facts set forth in the…