Opinion
No. 2D16–836.
08-17-2016
Ralf J. Panitz, pro se.
Ralf J. Panitz, pro se.
Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011) ; Moore v. State, 882 So.2d 977 (Fla.2004) ; Panitz v. State, 130 So.3d 233 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); Guilford v. State, 88 So.3d 998 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Carpenter v. State, 884 So.2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Burttram v. State, 846 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) ; Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Harris v. State, 777 So.2d 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ; Dorsett
v. State, 166 So.3d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; Fernandez v. State, 910 So.2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ; Williams v. State, 907 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) ; Atwater v. State, 781 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ; Thomas v. State, 778 So.2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.