From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paniplus Company v. Higgins

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 17, 1936
80 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1936)

Opinion

No. 185.

January 17, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

See, also, E. Regensburg Sons v. Higgins, 79 F.2d 516.

Chamberlin, Kafer, Wilds Jube, of New York City, for complainant.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., James W. Morris, Sewall Key, and Andrew W. Sharpe, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (F.W.H. Adams, U.S. Atty., Francis H. Horan and Edward J. Ennis, Asst. U.S. Attys., and William F. Young, Sp. Asst. to U.S. Atty., all of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been impounded or deposited below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. ___, January 13, 1936.


Summaries of

Paniplus Company v. Higgins

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 17, 1936
80 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1936)
Case details for

Paniplus Company v. Higgins

Case Details

Full title:The PANIPLUS COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Joseph T. HIGGINS…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 17, 1936

Citations

80 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1936)