From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panico v. Panico

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Feb 24, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 65314 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

Motion No: 2011-10784 Docket No. O-8785/11 M133732

02-24-2012

In the Matter of Albert Panico, respondent, v. Cory Panico, appellant.


, J.P.

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL

SHERI S. ROMAN

JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by counsel assigned to represent the appellant in Family Court to be relieved and for the assignment of new counsel to represent the appellant on an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated August 26, 2011, and for poor person relief for the appellant.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to be relieved is denied as unnecessary as counsel's assignment to represent the appellant does not continue on the appeal (see Family Court Act § 1120; 22 NYCRR 671.10); and it is further,

ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are for the assignment of new counsel and for poor person relief are granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,

ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant's counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant's brief upon those parties; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Family Court Act § 1120 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:

Larry Bachner, Esq.
and it is further,

ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any scheduling order or orders issued pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,

ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the Rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.

RIVERA, J.P., LEVENTHAL, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Panico v. Panico

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Feb 24, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 65314 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Panico v. Panico

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Albert Panico, respondent, v. Cory Panico, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 65314 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)