Panduit Corp. v. Corning Optical Commc'ns LLC

Full title: PANDUIT CORP., Appellant v. CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 8, 2019

2018-1999 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2019)

Opinion

2018-1999

08-08-2019

PANDUIT CORP., Appellant v. CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Appellee

JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC. JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD, JASON M. WILCOX; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-00009.

JUDGMENT

JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC. JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD, JASON M. WILCOX; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 8, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court