Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01341-LTB
08-10-2011
SACHCHIT KUMAR PANDEY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT HOMER RUSSELL, II, in his personal capacity, and JUSTIN MARK HANNEN, in his personal capacity, Defendants.
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL
Babcock, Senior Judge
Plaintiff has submitted a Notice of Appeal. Plaintiff previously was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this court in this action. The Court has examined the file and has determined that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must be denied. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith because plaintiff has not shown the existence of a reasoned, non-frivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because this appeal is not taken in good faith.
DATED at Denver, Colorado this 10th day of August, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
Lewis T. Babcock
SENIOR JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO