From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panchookian v. Huculiak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 19, 1999
257 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

January 19, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.).


Defendant's motion for vacatur of a default judgment entered against him, made less than one year after the date of the

judgment, was timely (CPLR 5015 [a]), and, as the record substantiates defendant's contention, and the motion court's finding, that defendant has a possibly meritorious defense to the action and a reasonable excuse for his default, the grant of the motion to the extent indicated was proper ( see, Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 141; Frenchy's Bar Grill v. United Intl. Ins. Co., 251 A.D.2d 177; Hunter v. Enquirer/Star, Inc., 210 A.D.2d 32).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Lerner, Rubin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Panchookian v. Huculiak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 19, 1999
257 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Panchookian v. Huculiak

Case Details

Full title:JANE M. W. PANCHOOKIAN, Appellant, v. DENNIS HUCULIAK, Also Known as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 19, 1999

Citations

257 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
682 N.Y.S.2d 841

Citing Cases

R.C. Baas Constr. Corp. v. FM Kelly Constr. Grp. Inc.

Initially, as noted above, Kelly has filed for bankruptcy and therefore the action against him must be…

Johnson v. Lui & Shields LLP

In the context of a motion to vacate a default in answering or to compel the acceptance of a late answer,…