From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pananyan v. White

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 24, 2023
1:22-cv-01613 JLT SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01613 JLT SKO (HC)

03-24-2023

ARSEN PANANYAN, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS WHITE, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(DOC. 9)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS, DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND CLOSE CASE

Arsen Pananyan filed this action, through counsel, to compel the Bureau of Prisons to calculate his accumulated credits. (Doc. 1) Now that the BOP has done so, he contends that the petition is moot, and he seeks dismissal of the action. (Doc. 7.) The magistrate judge recommended that the action be dismissed but afforded the parties time to file objections. (Doc. 9.) They did not.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), the Court conducted a de novo review. Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on March 5, 2023 (Doc. 9), are ADOPTED in full.

2. Petitioner's motion for voluntary dismissal (Doc. 7) is GRANTED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pananyan v. White

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 24, 2023
1:22-cv-01613 JLT SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Pananyan v. White

Case Details

Full title:ARSEN PANANYAN, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS WHITE, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 24, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-01613 JLT SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2023)