From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pamplin v. Libby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 10, 2020
Case No. 3:18-cv-00532-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 10, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 3:18-cv-00532-MMD-CLB

01-10-2020

JOHN DAVID PAMPLIN, Plaintiff, v. LIBBY, et al., Defendants

AARON D. FORD Attorney General PETER E. DUNKLEY, Bar No. 11110 Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Public Safety Division 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701-4717 Tel: (775) 684-1259 E-mail: pdunkley@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants Justin Libby


AARON D. FORD

Attorney General
PETER E. DUNKLEY, Bar No. 11110

Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Public Safety Division
100 N. Carson Street
Carson City, NV 89701-4717
Tel: (775) 684-1259
E-mail: pdunkley@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants
Justin Libby

MOTION TO WITHDRAW ANSWER AND OR SEAL CONTACT INFORMATION OF DEFENDANT

Defendant Justin Libby (Defendant) by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Peter E. Dunkley, Deputy Attorney General, hereby submits this Motion to Withdraw and/or Seal the Answer filed by Defendant (ECF No. 16 and 16-1) and to seal permanently ECF No. 16-1, which contains the personal contact information for Defendant Justin Libby.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

I. BACKGROUND

The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) filed last known addresses for Defendants (ECF No. 11). Defendant was served with a copy of the complaint on or about January 2, 2020. On January 8, 2020, Defendant, in pro per, filed an answer which included confidential contact information, which this court sealed, at least temporarily (ECF No. 16-1). Defendant did not know that the OAG had already provided the Court with Defendant's last known address. Also on January 8, 2020, Defendant requested representation from the Office of the Attorney General and the OAG agreed to do so. Accordingly, Defendant moves to withdraw his answer (ECF No. 16) and permanently seal his contact information (ECF No. 16-1).

II. ARGUMENT

Courts have recognized a general right of the public to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (internal citation omitted). The strong presumption of public access must be overcome by a party seeking to seal a judicial record. Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). This is a stringent standard, and a party must demonstrate '"a compelling reason and [articulate] a factual basis . . . without relying on hypothesis or conjecture" to justify sealing court records. Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1096-97. The "compelling reason" standard applies to any motion "more than tangentially related to the merits of a case[,]" but especially applies to dispositive motions. Id. at 1100-01. What constitutes a compelling reason is within the discretion of the District Court, including items that could "gratify private spite or promote public scandal...." Id. at 1097. Home addresses of law enforcement officers meets the compelling reason standard. See Roberts v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., No. 215CV00388JADPAL, 2016 WL 1611587, at *1 (D. Nev. Apr. 21, 2016) (unreported, citing Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1182; Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 5.2).

In this case, consistent with the standard practice in inmate litigation, which is to provide last known addresses, under seal, in order to protect against the disclosure of addresses of law enforcement officers, or former law enforcement officers. (See, e.g., ECF No. 11, (under seal filing of Defendants last known address).) Accordingly, Defendant respectfully withdraws his answer (ECF No. 16) and requests that his address and other contact information be sealed (ECF No. 16-1).

III. CONCLUSION

For the above stated reasons, Defendant requests that his answer be withdrawn and his personal contact information be sealed.

DATED this 9th day of January, 2020.

AARON D. FORD

Attorney General

By: /s/ Peter E. Dunkley

PETER E. DUNKLEY, Bar No. 11110

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED

/s/_________

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DATED: 1/10/2020

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I am an employee of the Office of the Attorney General, State of Nevada, and that on this 9th of January, 2020, I caused to be served a copy of the foregoing, MOTION TO WITHDRAW ANSWER AND OR SEAL CONTACT INFORMATION OF DEFENDANT, by U.S. District Court CM/ECF Electronic Filing on: John D. Pamplin #74405
Care of NNCC Law Librarian
Northern Nevada Correctional Center
P.O. Box 7000
Carson City, NV 89702
lawlibrary@doc.nv.gov

/s/ Caitie Collins

An employee of the

Office of the Attorney General


Summaries of

Pamplin v. Libby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 10, 2020
Case No. 3:18-cv-00532-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Pamplin v. Libby

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DAVID PAMPLIN, Plaintiff, v. LIBBY, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 10, 2020

Citations

Case No. 3:18-cv-00532-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Jan. 10, 2020)