From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palton v. Jackson

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Dec 11, 2006
5:06CV00198 SWW/HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 11, 2006)

Opinion

5:06CV00198 SWW/HDY.

December 11, 2006


ORDER


The Court has received proposed partial findings and recommendations from Magistrate Judge H. David Young. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety.

IT IS, THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to dismiss and amended motion to dismiss (DE ##35, 46), filed by defendants Barnett, Davis, Gibson, Harris, Hurst, Malone, Moore, Jackson, and Luckett are GRANTED in part, only with respect to plaintiff's monetary claims against them in their official capacities, and DENIED in all other respects.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (DE #44) is hereby construed as a motion for preliminary injunctive relief and should be docketed as such, and that defendants shall respond to such motion within fifteen days of the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Palton v. Jackson

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Dec 11, 2006
5:06CV00198 SWW/HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 11, 2006)
Case details for

Palton v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:JASON PALTON, ADC #95164, PLAINTIFF v. STEVEN JACKSON, et al., DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Dec 11, 2006

Citations

5:06CV00198 SWW/HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 11, 2006)